World Builder For Coh Download here. The Aimpoint Micro T-2 is the latest and greatest offering from Aimpoint, and is testament to the Aimpoint's constant pursuit of improvement! This cutting edge red.

I already had a LaRue Po`Boy: LaRue Pivot Mount (LT649) with Hensolt 2.5 optic. It is quite well regarded as a great value item and i have to agree with that assessment. It has been unofficially endorsed by none other than Larry Vickers as well. I got a decent deal on a NIB Aimpoint 3x mag ($402 delivered). I just couldn't pass it up. I was prepared to be disappointed.

Many people have told me that the Aimpoint 3x is over-rated and over-priced. In the opinion of this knucklehead, the Aimpoint 3x iz da fuggin hype!!!! When i took it out of the box and gave it a once over i was amazed at how clear the image was through the glass. Very crisp optics. I circumcised the rubber foreskin and mounted it in the LaRue Pivot Mount before attaching it to my rifle. I am very impressed. This may just be my new go-to set-up, once i have a few other things worked out on the rifle improvements over the Hensolt magnifier are: 1) the most critical difference is the eye relief.

ER on the Hensolt is very short. It is much longer and more forgiving with the Aimpoint 3x. 2) optical clarity.the Hensolt isn't bad but the Aimpoint is a good deal more crisp and less distorted (less fish lens effect). 3) mounting security.the Hensolt needs a plastic insert ring to fit in the LT mount. It is less than ideal. It can slide to and fro and because the eye relief is critical (and short) this can interfere with a proper sight picture 4) Field of View.there is less of a 'tunnel vision' effect or 'sighting down through a straw' feel with the Aimpoint compared the Hensolt. The FOV of the Aimpoint is still narrow compared to traditional magnified optics, but its improved over the Hensolt by a fair margin.

The Po`Boy optic has no warranty either through LaRue or Hensolt 6) the Aimpoint 3x has adjustments that allow you to center the dot in the sight picture of the magnifier. This reduces a shift in point of impact caused by parallax, which is exacerbated by magnifiers without this function. I never had a problem with this on the Hensolt.but it's a feature you can brag about i guess.

If you have a Po`Boy, is it worth upgrading to a Aimpoint 3x? I don't know. That's up to each individual.

The Hensolt does work very well for what it is. The retail price on the Aimpoint 3x is $500.

I think that is a bit steep. Even at the $400 i paid it was pretty expensive, but i really wanted one for a long time. Yeah yeah, on with the dirty porn pix lastly, as you probably know there are many many fake Aimpoint 3x's floating about. I've heard too many horror stories of people paying between $250 and $600 for a $69 chinese airsoft rip-off. I purchased mine from a very reputable source, so the discount didn't worry me. If you are buying one, here are the things to look out for: all Aimpoints come in an Aimpoint box with literature on heavy weight, glossy paper.

Aimpoint 3x magnifiers must be circumcised by the owner all Aimpoints use the same font throughout. Every Aimpoint has a unique serial number. When in doubt phone Aimpoint to confirm the serial number is authentic.

When buying an Aimpoint 3x look at the base.this is the dead give-away whether it is fake or not (pix courtesy of Arfcom, fake always on the left.real always on the right) FAKE the bottom of mine looks a bit different. The serial on my unit is inscribed in a different fashion and base just looks a bit 'cleaner' i think they revised the design.but you can still tell the difference between a fakie on the left and the real deal observe the shoddy base mount.

Notice how the rubber doesn't completely envelop the body? Notice how the rubber has torn running up the body of the optic? All FakePoints have coarse threading by the lenses.

Aimpoints use fine threads example of fine threads. Nice write up. I've been thinking about a magnifier for my T-1, but clone prices are just to hard to resist. Having compared a clone Aimpoint mag to a real deal Eotech, i'd say that the Aimpoint clone does suffer from cheaper glass (slightly less transmission, yellowish tint), but the price point of $50 is pretty hard to compare to a $500 real deal. I guess when buying the real real mag, you're comparing it to an ACOG. I'd be interested in just the Larue mount to see how fast it was, and it would aid me in accuracy.

Lucky me, there is a local rifle league every friday here, so I can test out how gear works under the stress of competion. Take the mag combo to a class/competition some time and let us know how it goes. Nice write up. I've been thinking about a magnifier for my T-1, but clone prices are just to hard to resist.

Having compared a clone Aimpoint mag to a real deal Eotech, i'd say that the Aimpoint clone does suffer from cheaper glass (slightly less transmission, yellowish tint), but the price point of $50 is pretty hard to compare to a $500 real deal. I guess when buying the real real mag, you're comparing it to an ACOG. I'd be interested in just the Larue mount to see how fast it was, and it would aid me in accuracy. Lucky me, there is a local rifle league every friday here, so I can test out how gear works under the stress of competion. Take the mag combo to a class/competition some time and let us know how it goes.

The LaRue flip-side is the best magnifier mount hands-down. Very intuitive and quick. Far better than the Aimpoint factory twist-off mount. I've done classes and comps with the po' boy with great results.

Skip the knock-off completely. If you want to save some $$ go with the LaRue Po' Boy. You get the best mount out there and a real military optic, not some chinese knock-off POS.

Plus, the optic only costs $50 when you buy it with a mount. Later on, if you want to upgrade to an Aimpoint magnifier, you have the best mount for it.

A few months ago I purchased an Aimpoint Comp M2 from a member of this forums for $300. When I received it, I turned it on, it worked, and everything seemed fine. So, I put it my safe while I was completing my AR build. I recently finished the build and mounted the scope. When I cycled through all of the clicks, I noticed that on the 6th click, the red dot changed to green. I also noticed that the holographic dot wasn’t very crisp like you would expect from an Aimpoint. Both of these characteristics seemed suspicious to me and I began to suspect that I might have been sold a fake.

I then contacted Freddie Blish from Aimpoint who confirm via serial # 10338 that it was indeed a fake. I contacted the person that sold it to me and he refused to refund my money. So, I wanted to educate you guys on my experience so that you do not get ripped off like I did. According to Freddie Blish of Aimpoint, the Chinese Comp m2 fakes have the serial #10338, which actually should be on a Comp ML2. Another tell tail sign is a green reticle. Aimpoint has never made a scope with a green reticle. Be on your guard, there are a lot of very good fakes and dishonest sellers out there, even on this forum.

See picks below. IM me for pics, if you would like to see it. A few months ago I purchased an Aimpoint Comp M2 from a member of this forums for $300. When I received it, I turned it on, it worked, and everything seemed fine. So, I put it my safe while I was completing my AR build. I recently finished the build and mounted the scope.

When I cycled through all of the clicks, I noticed that on the 6th click, the red dot changed to green. I also noticed that the holographic dot wasn’t very crisp like you would expect from an Aimpoint.

Both of these characteristics seemed suspicious to me and I began to suspect that I might have been sold a fake. I then contacted Freddie Blish from Aimpoint who confirm via serial # 10338 that it was indeed a fake. I contacted the person that sold it to me and he refused to refund my money. So, I wanted to educate you guys on my experience so that you do not get ripped off like I did. According to Freddie Blish of Aimpoint, the Chinese Comp m2 fakes have the serial #10338, which actually should be on a Comp ML2. Another tell tail sign is a green reticle.

Aimpoint has never made a scope with a green reticle. Be on your guard, there are a lot of very good fakes and dishonest sellers out there, even on this forum. See picks below. A few months ago I purchased an Aimpoint Comp M2 from a member of this forums for $300. When I received it, I turned it on, it worked, and everything seemed fine. So, I put it my safe while I was completing my AR build.

I recently finished the build and mounted the scope. When I cycled through all of the clicks, I noticed that on the 6th click, the red dot changed to green. I also noticed that the holographic dot wasn’t very crisp like you would expect from an Aimpoint. Both of these characteristics seemed suspicious to me and I began to suspect that I might have been sold a fake. I then contacted Freddie Blish from Aimpoint who confirm via serial # 10338 that it was indeed a fake.

I contacted the person that sold it to me and he refused to refund my money. So, I wanted to educate you guys on my experience so that you do not get ripped off like I did. According to Freddie Blish of Aimpoint, the Chinese Comp m2 fakes have the serial #10338, which actually should be on a Comp ML2. Another tell tail sign is a green reticle.

Aimpoint has never made a scope with a green reticle. Be on your guard, there are a lot of very good fakes and dishonest sellers out there, even on this forum. See picks below. IM me for pics, if you would like to see it. You do need to pay attention. I saw a used Comp M4 at Cabelas in Dundee in the bargain cave probably 8 months ago.

I started playing with it, it didn't seem quite right. Same thing, after a few clicks the dot went green. I let the workers know that they had been had, that someone had returned a fake optic in place of a real one, and that in good faith they shouldn't be selling this one as authentic.

They didn't care. They figured some shmuck was going to buy it sooner or later, thinking he got a good deal. I imagine they were right. Y'all are quick to condemn the OP for not having complained about the allegedly bogus optic for several months, but I can see how the same might happen to me. I know there have been times in the past where I bought something while it was available at a good price for use later. Hell, I have a pair of woodworking bench vises that are still sitting in their boxes for the woodworking bench I never finished, bought 10-12 years ago or better:p. One of those could easily have a casting defect that wouldn't reveal itself until I actually mounted the vise and went to use it.

(No, I would not expect the store to take either of 'em back after all this time.) IMO the seller's story isn't without flaws. I noted that as soon as somebody mentioned his old advert not mentioning the high-end GGG mount he claims was on the sight he sold, *bang*: He closes his thread. The picture-posting site he used for the pictures has expired them, but he doesn't have them around anymore, either? (I still have all the pictures for the one thing I've sold here, so far.) IMO it's still up in the air as to who's at fault in this one. Personally: I wouldn't do business with either of them at this point. One of the forum members emailed this to me last night and I clearly proves that I was scammed.

See below: Hey - I saw your pictures on migunowners.org and I saw the original ad that the seller edited yesterday: It won't last long but here is a Google cache of that ad, before he edited the photo link: truck+crapped+out,+have+to+sell+one+of+my+favorite +optics.%22&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us Here is a link to the seller's photos which clearly show he is lying about the mount and optic now: You should download those pictures ASAP and save them as evidence that he is lying about what he sold you. What an ass.it's just too bad you didn't identify it as a fake right away but he is clearly trying to cover his tracks now.

Assuming the Google cache evidence is legitimate. Mini Kms Activator Office 2010 Free Download here. Well, isn't this interesting. Google cache: Transfer case on my truck crapped out, have to sell one of my favorite optics. Up for sale is a one year old Aimpoint Comp M2withthe 4 MOA dot. GG&G cantilever picatinny mount in pics comes with the sight.

Clip it on your AR and go. (MP15in pics is not for sale sorry) sight retails for about $500 new without mount. Showing a date of, 10:58 PM OP of thread as it exists on MGO's server right now: Transfer case on my truck crapped out, have to sell one of my favorite optics. Up for sale is a one year old Aimpoint Comp M2withthe 4 MOA dot. Cantilever picatinny mount in pics comes with the sight. Clip it on your AR and go.

(MP15in pics is not for sale sorry) sight retails for about $500 new without mount. SIGHT IS SOLD THANKS Last edited by PaulB84: at 11:10 AM. Hey seller: Why, two days ago, did you edit your advert from three months ago?

And, assuming it's legit, why did the original advert specifically mention 'GG&G,' and the recently-altered version not? Hey seller: Why, two days ago, did you edit your advert from three months ago? And, assuming it's legit, why did the original advert specifically mention 'GG&G,' and the recently-altered version not? He also needs to explain why did he stated in the other thread (that he locked himself) that the Aimpoint comes with GGG mount and in the ad it originally said that the 'GGG mount pictured is included' while all his pictures that use to be posted do not show nothing but a regular mount, not GGG:scratch. FWIW, be careful. There are fake Eotech's out there as well.

I know, I have one on my GSG-5:D Mine didn't come with actual Eotech logos, but other's have. 'Fake'points and 'EOFakes' are not new news. They have been around for years. Some that look the same or very similar without logos, and others that look the same with actual logos. This board is no different than any other on the interwebz. Buyers need to know what they are buying and check stuff out when they receive it. DO YOUR HOMEWORK!

Then you cant whine and complain about someone else taking advantage of you!!!! Remember, its ALWAYS someone elses fault. ( the obamy defense ):bash. I am not taking sides in this specific dispute, as I do not have all the facts, haven't been retained by anyone, and generally don't give a crap. Let me clue you all in a bit. If one sells an object as a genuine product, i.e., an Aimpoint, and it turns out to be counterfeit, the seller has materially breached the fundamental terms of the contract.

He has not delivered the item he contracted to sell. Accordingly, the seller owes the buyer complete recompense, including the sales price and any and all incidental expenses incurred by the buyer, such as shipping. Even an 'As Is' sale requires that the item sold actually be the item contracted for sale.

If one sells an object as a genuine product, i.e., an Aimpoint, and it turns out to be counterfeit, AND the seller had actual knowledge that it was counterfeit, the seller has not only materially breached the fundamental terms of the contract, but has also committed fraud, which is both a criminal and a civil matter. Have fun folks. I am not taking sides in this specific dispute, as I do not have all the facts, haven't been retained by anyone, and generally don't give a crap.

Let me clue you all in a bit. If one sells an object as a genuine product, i.e., an Aimpoint, and it turns out to be counterfeit, the seller has materially breached the fundamental terms of the contract.

He has not delivered the item he contracted to sell. Accordingly, the seller owes the buyer complete recompense, including the sales price and any and all incidental expenses incurred by the buyer, such as shipping. Even an 'As Is' sale requires that the item sold actually be the item contracted for sale. If one sells an object as a genuine product, i.e., an Aimpoint, and it turns out to be counterfeit, AND the seller had actual knowledge that it was counterfeit, the seller has not only materially breached the fundamental terms of the contract, but has also committed fraud, which is both a criminal and a civil matter. Have fun folks. Agreed but the 4 month wait plays a pretty significant role here too. I've known about fake optics for years, I even have some.

If you guys want to find a plethora of fake optics and accessories, just look on some of the airsoft sites. There you can buy a fake version of just about any optic, mount, RIS, or any other accessory that you can think of. Nearly all of them fit on real firearms and many of them have OEM factory markings. What's amazing is that some of the knockoffs actually hold up rather well, and if you don't run your guns hard, you may never know that your $400 part is really a $50 airsoft accessory. It simply doesn't pass the smell test. Not taking either side on this so don't read into it.

If I sold something that I believed to be genuine and the guy came back 4 months later I would have a hard time believing it was the same item I sold. That would go to the weight of the evidence, not the fundamental issue involved, i.e., whether the parties contracted for the sale of a genuine Aimpoint and the Seller delivered a fake. Buyer would have the burden of proof regardless. Trier of fact might have a harder time believing him due to the four month delay.